Against Wycombe, should we have......

[beerbantam]

stuck with the team that beat MK Dons??

Obviously we lost so its easier to be critical, but changing the team from an 11 who all played in their natural or best positions and who played really well against a very good MK dons team seems odd to me.

I expected Thorne to come back in for Boulding because he is our no.1 striker, but bringing a centreback into midfield and putting a central midfielder out on the right just seems plain crazy to me, very negative and the result reflected that.

[peter beagrie is mint]

I said exactly the same. You can't put a loanee centre-back in such a key posistion, Law should have been there and Daley wide right.Anyroad it's history now...onwards and upwards:confused:

[Parrot]

Osbourne would have had to have set the World alight to keep his place and by all accounts he was far from impressive.

Agree with the rest though, Laws wasted on the wings and Tom Clarkes not a defensive midfielder as far as i know?:confused:

Maybe If he'd had picked a different team we'd had lost 3-0 and everyone would be asking why he didn't change it etc...:rolleyes:

[Spoonhead]

He could have put Thorne up front and Boulding on the left so only dropping Osbourne. We'd have won 4-0 then. Or 5-0.

[Parrot]

He could have put Thorne up front and Boulding on the left so only dropping Osbourne. We'd have won 4-0 then. Or 5-0.

Its all "Ifs", "buts" and "maybes" though aint it?:rolleyes:

No one knows, even ReDBoOks balls have let him down lately!:eek: